PFAS in Groundwater Remediation: Pump-and-Treat vs. In Situ Treatment Technologies

Groundwater Contamination: The Persistent Challenge

PFAS-contaminated groundwater plumes persist for decades due to chemical stability and subsurface sorption dynamics. Remediation is technically challenging and expensive, requiring selection among competing treatment approaches.

Pump-and-Treat Systems

Conventional pump-and-treat extracts contaminated groundwater for above-ground treatment using granular activated carbon or ion exchange resins. While effective for plume containment, pump-and-treat cannot achieve complete aquifer restoration given PFAS desorption kinetics.

In Situ Treatment Approaches

Emerging in situ approaches include permeable reactive barriers using GAC or zeolite, colloidal activated carbon injection, and in situ chemical reduction. Thermal treatment using electrical resistance heating can destroy PFAS in source zones.

Regulatory and Cost Considerations

EPA Superfund PFAS cleanups average $50M–$200M per site for groundwater remediation. Responsible party liability allocation—including AFFF manufacturers and military contractors—remains contentious in ongoing litigation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top