PFAS Contamination in New England: The Region’s Military, Industrial, and Regulatory Legacy

New England’s PFAS Story: From Ground Zero to Regulatory Leadership

New England—comprising Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut—has been at the epicenter of US PFAS contamination awareness and regulatory response. Several of the nation’s most significant PFAS contamination cases originated in the region: Pease Air National Guard Base (NH) was one of the first military PFAS contamination sites to be publicly disclosed; Hoosick Falls, NY (adjacent to New England) exposed 4,000 residents to industrial PFAS from Saint-Gobain’s PTFE manufacturing; Maine’s agricultural PFAS crisis revealed how broadly biosolids had spread PFAS to farmland; and Cape Cod, Massachusetts hosts some of the most extensively studied PFAS groundwater plumes in the world. This contamination experience has made New England states among the most progressive in PFAS regulation.

Pease Air National Guard Base: The Case That Changed Everything

The 2014 discovery of PFAS contamination in the Haven Well at Pease Air National Guard Base—which had supplied water to thousands of individuals including the base’s on-base childcare center since the 1970s—galvanized US PFAS awareness and drove Congressional action on military PFAS contamination. Health investigations of former Haven Well users documented elevated blood PFAS concentrations and evidence of immune suppression in children exposed during the most sensitive developmental periods. Pease became the first community to receive Congressional PFAS health funding through the NH-04 federal PFAS health study. Former Pease personnel and affected residents formed the Seacoast PFAS Coalition—a citizen advocacy organization that has influenced both state and federal PFAS policy through direct Congressional testimony and media engagement. New Hampshire’s progressive PFAS regulatory framework—among the most stringent in the US—directly reflects the political legacy of the Pease contamination.

Maine: Agricultural PFAS Crisis

Maine’s agricultural PFAS crisis—triggered by the discovery of 2,000+ ppt PFAS in milk from Stoneridge Farm in Fairfield and subsequent state investigation that identified PFAS contamination at dozens of farms—revealed how broadly PFAS from biosolids land application had spread through Maine’s agricultural system. The Maine Legislature’s response was comprehensive: L.D. 1503 required PFAS product reporting; L.D. 906 banned PFAS in biosolids land application (effective immediately for high-PFAS biosolids, 2030 for all biosolids); L.D. 1911 created a Maine Farms PFAS Testing and Remediation Fund. Maine DEP established statewide PFAS soil screening values and private well testing protocols for agricultural properties. Maine’s agricultural PFAS experience—and the speed of its legislative response—has provided a template for other states confronting farmland PFAS contamination.

Massachusetts: Cape Cod and the Ashumet Valley Plume

The Ashumet Valley aquifer on Cape Cod—contaminated by AFFF from Otis Air National Guard Base over decades—represents one of the most extensively scientifically studied PFAS groundwater plumes in the world. USGS and EPA research at the Ashumet Valley site has generated foundational science on PFAS transport, sorption, and natural attenuation in sandy Cape Cod soils. Massachusetts’ PFAS regulatory program—establishing 20 ppt combined PFOA/PFOS drinking water limits before EPA’s federal standards—reflected the state’s extensive PFAS contamination experience. Massachusetts DEP’s PFAS6 regulatory program covers 6 compounds in drinking water; the state’s MassDEP PFAS information portal is one of the most comprehensive state PFAS communication resources in the US. Massachusetts’ IIJA funding allocation for PFAS water infrastructure is among the largest of any state in per-capita terms.

New England’s PFAS experience—from military contamination to industrial discharge to agricultural biosolids spread—has made the region a laboratory for PFAS regulatory innovation, producing the most progressive state-level frameworks and providing a national template for comprehensive PFAS management.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top